Our verdict
A well-maintained, widely adopted project. This assessment is derived from GitHub's own repository metrics on 2026-08-24, not from hands-on testing.
The context API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥. The project is written primarily in TypeScript, released under AGPL-3.0, and has 171,814 stars and 9,509 forks on GitHub. 171 contributors have committed to it, and the most recent push was 2026-08-24. The latest tagged release is v2.11.0 (2026-06-19). Figures come from the GitHub API on 2026-08-24 and are refreshed daily; the score below weighs adoption, maintenance, release discipline, contributor breadth, licence clarity and issue hygiene.
Repository
- Licence
- AGPL-3.0
- Language
- TypeScript
- Last push
- 2026-08-24
Releases
-
v2.11.0Firecrawl v2.11.0 -
v2.10Firecrawl v2.10 -
v2.9.0v2.9.0 -
v2.8.0v2.8.0 -
v2.7.0v2.7.0 -
v2.6.0v2.6.0
What it does well
- Markdown-first output built for LLMs
- Self-hostable under AGPL-3.0
- Handles JS-rendered pages
- Structured extraction with schemas
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Pricing
| Tier | Monthly | Includes | Seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | 1,000 credits, no card | |
| Hobby | $16 | Side projects | |
| Standard our pick | $83 | Billed yearly | |
| Growth | $333 | High volume | |
| Enterprise | Custom | Contact sales |
On video
User reviews
No user reviews yet.
Be the first to review FirecrawlFirecrawl alternatives
Side by side
| Tool | Our score | From | Free tier | Best for | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firecrawl this page | 9.1 | $16 | Yes | Developers building RAG pipelines and research agents | |
| Browserbase | 10.0 | $1 | Yes | ||
| ECC | 9.4 | — | Yes | ||
| Browser Use | 9.3 | — | Yes | ||
| Apify | 9.2 | $1 | Yes | ||
| Gemini CLI | 9.2 | — | Yes | ||
| Claude Mem | 9.1 | — | Yes |
Questions
Can I self-host it?
Yes. The repository is AGPL-3.0 licensed, so self-hosting is supported. Note the AGPL obligations if you build a hosted service on it.
Is there a free tier?
Yes, 1,000 credits with no card required.
