TradingAgents
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework
Our verdict
A solid, actively developed project. This assessment is derived from GitHub's own repository metrics on 2026-08-24, not from hands-on testing.
TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework. It is written in Python. It has 99,713 stars and 20 contributors, and it was last touched a couple of months ago. The Apache-2.0 licence puts no real constraint on commercial use. The most recent tagged release is v0.3.1, from 2026-07-05. Figures come from the GitHub API on 2026-08-26 and refresh daily.
Reviewed by AI Review Rating from GitHub API data How we score
Repository
- Licence
- Apache-2.0
- Language
- Python
- Last push
- 2026-07-18
Releases
-
v0.3.1TradingAgents v0.3.1 -
v0.3.0TradingAgents v0.3.0 -
v0.2.5TradingAgents v0.2.5 -
v0.2.4TradingAgents v0.2.4 -
v0.2.3TradingAgents v0.2.3 -
v0.2.2TradingAgents v0.2.2
Pros and cons
Pros
Cons
Pricing
- Free tierYes
- LicenceApache-2.0
- Self-hostYes, source is public
- Public price listNot published
TradingAgents does not publish a web price list. For consumer apps that usually means pricing appears inside the product; for enterprise tools it means talking to sales. Why we do this
Visit arxiv.orgTrends
Price points are recorded when a price moves, not on a schedule, so a flat run means the price held. Release cadence comes from GitHub releases. A series appears only once we have watched it for long enough to have more than one observation.
Changelog
On video
User reviews
No one has reviewed TradingAgents here yet. Reviews are moderated before they appear, and our own score is editorial and separate from user ratings, though once reviews land they do lift it.
Used TradingAgents? Review it.
Sign in to rate it. One account, one review per tool, so the score means something.
Requiring an account is how we keep this page free of drive-by spam. We never sell your address.
TradingAgents alternatives
Side by side
| Tool | Our score | From | Free tier | Best for | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TradingAgents this page | 7.0 | - | Yes | ||
| 🥇LangChain | 8.4 | $1 | Yes | ||
| 🥈DocsBot | 8.3 | - | Yes | ||
| 🥉ECC | 8.1 | - | Yes | ||
| Browser Use | 8.0 | - | Yes | ||
| Claude Mem | 7.8 | - | Yes | ||
| Langflow | 7.8 | - | Yes |
Questions
Is TradingAgents free?
Yes. TradingAgents advertises a free tier on its own site.
How much does TradingAgents cost?
TradingAgents does not publish pricing openly, which usually means it is quote-based. You will need to contact the vendor.
Is TradingAgents open source?
Yes. TradingAgents is a public repository released under Apache-2.0. You can self-host or inspect the source directly.
How is TradingAgents scored here?
TradingAgents scores 7.0 out of 10. That comes from a desk review of public evidence, which is capped at 8.5 out of 10: public pricing, documentation, maintenance signals and how much we could actually verify. Affiliate relationships are excluded from scoring entirely. The full rubric is published on our methodology page.