Add this badge to your site
Run or build CrewAI? Paste this where your reviews or press logos go. It links to this review and always shows the current score and review date. Every tool we score 7.0 or higher can use it. It is free, and it does not change a score.
Need a launch video for CrewAI? We make 45 to 90 second explainers from $79. See the explainer service
Our verdict
CrewAI’s own description: “The Leading Multi-Agent Platform.” It is built in Python. It has 57,572 stars and 304 contributors, and it was pushed to within the last few weeks. The MIT licence puts no real constraint on commercial use. The most recent tagged release is 1.15.17, from 2026-08-20. Figures come from the GitHub API on 2026-08-26 and refresh weekly.
Reviewed by AI Review Rating desk review against the published rubric How we score
Repository
- Licence
- MIT
- Language
- Python
- Last push
- 2026-11-06
Releases
-
1.15.361.15.36 -
1.15.351.15.35 -
1.15.341.15.34 -
1.15.331.15.33 -
1.15.321.15.32 -
1.15.311.15.31
Pricing
- Free tierYes
- LicenceMIT
- Self-hostYes, source is public
- Public price listYes
We do not republish prices we have not checked by hand, because automated price extraction proved unreliable enough to mislead. The vendor’s own page has the current figures. Why we do this
View pricing on crewai.comTrends
Price points are recorded when a price moves, not on a schedule, so a flat run means the price held. Release cadence comes from GitHub releases. A series appears only once we have watched it for long enough to have more than one observation.
Changelog
On video
What users actually say
- Who's using crewAI really? Reddit · 2025
- LangChain vs CrewAI - which one do you like for agent … Reddit · 2025
- How are AI startups using CrewAI if it's so slow? Can I … Reddit · 2025
- Is crewAI really an agent framework or just managed … Reddit · 2025
- CrewAI vs LangGraph Reddit · 2026
We link to discussions rather than reproducing them. Opinions belong to their authors.
User reviews
No one has reviewed CrewAI here yet. Reviews are moderated before they appear, and our own score is editorial and separate from user ratings, though once reviews land they do lift it.
Used CrewAI? Review it.
Sign in to rate it. One account, one review per tool, so the score means something.
Requiring an account is how we keep this page free of drive-by spam. We never sell your address.
CrewAI alternatives
Side by side
| Tool | Our score | From | Free tier | Best for | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrewAI this page | 7.3 | - | Yes | ||
| 🥇LangChain | 8.4 | $1 | Yes | ||
| 🥈ECC | 8.1 | - | Yes | ||
| 🥉Browser Use | 8.0 | - | Yes | ||
| Claude Mem | 7.8 | - | Yes | ||
| Langflow | 7.8 | - | Yes | ||
| DeepSeek Harness | 7.7 | - | Yes |
Articles on CrewAI
Covers CrewAI
Best Open Source AI Agent Frameworks in 2026: 19 Checked on GitHub the Same Morning, the Licence Fine Print a Startup Must Read, and $49 to $250 a Month for a 5-Person Team’s Managed Layer
For a startup or small dev team: 19 agent framework repositories checked on GitHub on 8 October 2026. The frameworks…
Covers CrewAI
CrewAI vs LangGraph vs AutoGen in 2026: AutoGen Is in Maintenance Mode, So a 5-Developer Team Is Choosing Between $0 Self-Hosted and $195 to $645 a Month on LangSmith
For a development team choosing an agent framework: AutoGen's README says it is in maintenance mode, so the real choice…
Questions
Is CrewAI free?
Yes. The framework is MIT licensed and free to self-host, and CrewAI’s hosted platform has a Basic plan at $0 a month with 50 workflow executions and 2 automations. Enterprise is priced by quote. Read on crewai.com/pricing on 2026-10-02.
How much does CrewAI cost?
The open source framework costs nothing. On crewai.com/pricing (read 2026-10-02) the hosted platform lists Basic at $0 a month with 50 workflow executions, and Enterprise as custom pricing with no published self-serve paid tier.
Is CrewAI open source?
Yes. CrewAI is a public repository released under MIT. You can self-host or inspect the source directly.
How is CrewAI scored here?
CrewAI scores 7.3 out of 10. That comes from a desk review of public evidence, which is capped at 8.5 out of 10: public pricing, documentation, maintenance signals and how much we could actually verify. Affiliate relationships are excluded from scoring entirely. The full rubric is published on our methodology page.