Sign in

Caveman

🪨 why use many token when few token do trick - Claude Code skill that cuts 65% of tokens by talking like caveman

6.7 Open source100.7k
Caveman homepage
caveman.so · captured 2026-09-01
New Joe & Mac Caveman Ninja Review: A game that goes well with Uber eat
I benchmarked caveman against two words
This Agent Skill saves you 75% Tokens - Caveman Skill Demo
The Caveman Test - How to just "instantly know" if something sucks
Caveman Claude Code Is the New Meta (Here's the Science)
I Tested NEW Caveman AI Skill in Claude Code: Does it Really Save Tokens?

Our verdict

A usable project with some maintenance caveats. This assessment is derived from GitHub's own repository metrics on 2026-08-24, not from hands-on testing.

Caveman bills itself as 🪨 why use many token when few token do trick, and it is written in Go. It has 100,681 stars and 35 contributors, and it was pushed to within the last few weeks. No recognised licence is declared, which leaves reuse on uncertain ground whatever the code quality. The most recent tagged release is v2.3.1, from 2026-08-23. Figures come from the GitHub API on 2026-08-26 and refresh daily.

Reviewed by AI Review Rating from GitHub API data How we score

RepositoryGitHub API, refreshed daily

100.7kStars
5.9kForks
238Watching
35Contributors
371Open issues
Licence
Not declared
Language
Go
Last push
2026-08-24
View on GitHub

Releases

  1. v2.3.1 v2.3.1
  2. v2.3.0 v2.3.0
  3. bin-v1.1.3 bin-v1.1.3
  4. v2.2.0 v2.2.0
  5. bin-v1.1.2 bin-v1.1.2
  6. bin-v1.1.1 bin-v1.1.1

Pros and cons

Pros

Cons

Pricing

  • Free tierYes
  • LicenceNot declared
  • Self-hostYes, source is public
  • Public price listNot published

Caveman does not publish a web price list. For consumer apps that usually means pricing appears inside the product; for enterprise tools it means talking to sales. Why we do this

Visit caveman.so

Changelogwhat changed, most recent first

On videoclick to play, nothing loads until you do

User reviews

No one has reviewed Caveman here yet. Reviews are moderated before they appear, and our own score is editorial and separate from user ratings, though once reviews land they do lift it.

Used Caveman? Review it.

Sign in to rate it. One account, one review per tool, so the score means something.

Create a free account Already a member? Sign in
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Caveman alternatives

Side by side

ToolOur scoreFrom Free tierBest for
Caveman this page 6.7 - Yes
🥇Exa 8.5 - Yes
🥈Inbound GPT 8.5 - Yes
🥉MD Editor 8.5 - Yes
Supabase 8 - Yes
Gemini CLI 7.8 - Yes
Context7 7.7 - Yes

Questions

Is Caveman free?

Yes. Caveman advertises a free tier on its own site.

How much does Caveman cost?

Caveman does not publish pricing openly, which usually means it is quote-based. You will need to contact the vendor.

Is Caveman open source?

Yes. Caveman is a public repository released under Not declared. You can self-host or inspect the source directly.

How is Caveman scored here?

Caveman scores 6.7 out of 10. That comes from a desk review of public evidence, which is capped at 8.5 out of 10: public pricing, documentation, maintenance signals and how much we could actually verify. Affiliate relationships are excluded from scoring entirely. The full rubric is published on our methodology page.

Related